God: A Guide for the Perplexed

Friday 14th, June 2013 / 22:52

watkins-godperplexed

(by Keith Ward)

This article first appeared in Watkins’ Mind Body Spirit #34, Summer 2013.

It is remarkable how atheism is becoming fashionable in England. It has become almost compulsory to say that one does not believe in God, if one is to stay abreast of fashion. It is equally remarkable that very few people have any idea of what great spiritual teachers have said about God. Their knowledge of God is confined to a few stereotypical ideas about an invisible person living just outside the universe who interferes in it from time to time, and who long ago dictated a few ethical commands to groups of nomadic peasants, commands which can now be seen to be thoroughly irrational and obsolete.

What our culture seems to have lost is any sense of a spiritual dimension to life, and any sense that there is more to reality than collections of physical particles accidentally arranged in complicated patterns. If sensible people are to counter this lack of awareness, we do not need ‘proofs of God’ or defensive assertions of some rigid orthodoxy. We need to learn again the roots of spiritual perception, and the sense of the sacred that permeates human experience, if only we would attend to it.

What I have tried to do in my book God: A Guide for the Perplexed, is to explore the ways in which the word ‘God’ has been used by some of the greatest writers on spirituality to articulate or express perceptions of the spiritual dimension of life. The word ‘God’ has an intellectual history. It moves from Greek polytheism to the deeply apophatic teachings of the great mystics, from taboos and rituals to the apprehension of what Dante called ‘the love that moves the sun and other stars’, from the changeless and eternal being of medieval theology to the self-realising Absolute of German Idealism, and from intellectual belief in an intelligent designer of the universe to a passionate commitment to the ultimate goodness of being. In the book, I try to outline and discuss these ideas in their historical context.

This has been a historical process, and I am not implying that human interpretations of reality always got better. There have also been some horrifying uses of ‘God’ to repress thought and freedom. But, by examining what philosophers like Plato, Augustine, Aquinas, Kant, Hegel, and Whitehead have written, I have tried to show that there has always been a strong and wholly reasonable defence of a spiritual view of the world. The term ‘God’ has been used to express that view in a number of related but rather different ways.

The whole point is that this has not been an abstractly intellectual process, and I have wanted to pay close attention to the writing of poets and mystics, too. I have also wanted to do it in a sometimes rather light-hearted way – not because the subject is funny peculiar, but because the human mind is such a small and petty thing to really understand the deep truths of the spiritual realm. Humour seems appropriate when our best efforts at understanding are often so shallow.

GOD: A Guide for the Perplexed by Keith Ward, published by Oneworld, paperback (272 pages).

The title of the book comes from the medieval Jewish thinker Maimonides and, like his book of that title, mine does not claim to lead people out of their perplexity. Actually, it aims to make them more perplexed than ever, but to see that if you do not get perplexed about ultimate reality, you just have not thought deeply enough about it. The point is to make perplexity positive. That is, to see it as leading to insights that cannot be easily expressed, and that in reality lie beyond the boundaries of human language, but that have the power to change human lives.

The change is one of moving from thinking that we understand everything clearly, and we have it all taped. The fashionable view that we are made of nothing but physical particles is a good example of this delusion. Human mind and consciousness is, and will always be, a mystery in the sense that we will never comprehend it fully in any human language. But we know enough to realise that perceptions, thoughts, images and feelings, cannot be accounted for in purely physical terms, and they lead us into a world of spirit, of non-physical truths and realities that are to be apprehended non-conceptually.

There are many ways of apprehending spiritual realities, and we have to use symbols and images to evoke and express such apprehensions. ‘God’ is only one of these symbols, and for some people the word carries so many negative connotations that it can no longer be helpfully used (for instance, if it leads you to think of a male tyrant and manipulator of everything). A study of the history of thought about God will show that this would be a great misunderstanding of what philosophers and spiritual writers have usually sought to convey. ‘God’, I suggest, is a rather complex concept one of the main functions of which is to unite and integrate many different forms of spiritual perception under one central idea – though without depriving them of their force.

My own conception of God is to think of God as a self-existent reality of supreme beauty, from which the physical world flows as a sort of ‘overflow’ or ‘self-expressive manifestation’. The destiny of beings in the physical world is to realise distinctive values that their unique lives make possible, and ultimately to return to their source in the One Real, without abandoning their selfhood. You may well recognise this as a blend of the ‘Qualified Non-dualism’ of the Indian sage Ramanuja with a more typically Abrahamic idea of an ultimate moral goal for the universe. It is an idea which may be maintained in many religious paths, though I belong to one version of the Christian path, which takes Christ to be an earthly (and obviously very partial, though genuine) manifestation of the One Real.

The book is not an attempt to get everyone to take my view at all. It is rather an attempt to outline what major thinkers in history have said about ‘God’, and thereby to counter the over-simplified and naive views of some modern atheists, and to remind theists of the richness, diversity, and complexity of the idea of the God they believe in. It is meant to be a guide to living with perplexity, or perhaps I should say, to living with mystery. For Spirit is the ultimate mystery, and yet it transforms the way we see the whole of our human experience in this transitory and ephemeral world. I hope that if such a view became widely accepted, it would help to increase tolerance between religions, better understanding of what religion is really about, and friendship between people who walk in different paths of faith. Is such a hope realistic? Well, as Plato once said about a perfectly just society, at least each of us can make it a little bit more realistic in our own lives.

***

Keith Ward

Keith Ward is Professorial Research Fellow at Heythrop College, London University. He is a Fellow of the British Academy. He was formerly Professor of the History and Philosophy of Religion at King’s College, London, Regius Professor of Divinity at Oxford University, and a member of the executive council of the Royal Institute of Philosophy. www.keithward.org.uk

, , ,

1 Comments on “God: A Guide for the Perplexed

  • I’m thankful for stumbling across this article here, and Mr. Ward’s book is one I must attend to more fully. How needed such views are in a world increasingly tending toward polarity of thought/belief, and which Mr. Ward rightly attributes in part to the New Atheism movement – admirer of the late Christopher Hitchens though I am. The theists must shoulder their share of responsibility too of course, as again Mr. Ward points out here in referencing the repression of thought and freedoms that can accompany religious dogma.

    As a Christian, Mr. Ward appears a Zen-like one at that, with his ideas about making perplexity a virtue in so much as it may free the mind from its own conditioned mechanisms via insight. Perhaps my experience is anomalous, but I find many Christians of an intellectual nature – indeed some professional priests too – are very attracted to Buddhistic and Vedic conceptions, perhaps because of the parallels with Christian mysticism. This, I feel certain, is a very good thing if managed skilfully and as is quite apparently so in Mr. Ward’s case.

    If asked whether I believe in God, I feel compelled to enquire as to what the questioner means by the term. This isn’t to be pedantic or tricky (though it is boring I know), but merely because I’m happy to use and relate to the term – belief here being extraneous – if the definition were something similar to Mr. Ward’s: let’s say ‘the uncreate’, out of which the world and beings find creative expression. Or an individual level: the illusory interplay of subjectivity and objectivity. For myself, other definitions of the word are either meaningless or fanciful, so it may prove difficult to use the term with good grace.

    I can see though, that as Mr. Ward implies, ‘God’ is a useful concept – a ‘symbol’ he calls it – for referencing what is in actuality non-conceptual, the ineffable and uncreate, the noumenon, what appears before the mind, and yet is not of nor is derived by the mind. So God is a useful idea, a three-lettered pointer or abstraction, though not a thing in itself: an outer meaning without an inner one. I mean no offence here to believers and hope that is understood.

    The idea set out by Mr. Ward is based in the fostering of tolerance – and who would argue against that? I think we may know the answer already, and doubtless this seemingly fine book has the capacity to sway any arguers’ point of view. Let us hope they become more perplexed through the reading of it. I’m quite sure I will.

Comments are closed.

Facebook Comments

Videos

Watch
At the Edge of the Ayahuasca Ceremony by Sophia Rokhlin

At the Edge of the Ayahuasca Ceremony by Sophia Rokhlin

Sophia Rokhlin, co-author of “When Plants Dream”, discusses the economic, legal and cultural dimensions of the psychoactive potion’s popularity in…

Bookshelf

Read
Watkins Books: Staff Picks for September

Watkins Books: Staff Picks for September

The erudite employees of Watkins Books are back this month with another pair of reading recommendations to grace the top…

,

Search

Recent Articles

Magazine
Watkins’ Spiritual 100 List for 2019

Watkins’ Spiritual 100 List for 2019

We are delighted to share with you Watkins’ 2019 list of the 100 Most Spiritually Influential Living People – spiritual…

Watkins on the Web

RSS YouTube

Facebook